The Lead Off More than 1,800 people have signed a petition opposing a planned Buc-ee’s travel center in Mansfield. Opponents cite concerns about traffic, environmental impacts, crime, and effects on neighboring properties. Local officials continue to support the project, pointing to anticipat ed jobs and economic development benefits. MANSFIELD, OHIO (WOWO) A growing petition campaign is seeking to halt construction of a planned Buc-ee’s travel center in Mansfield, with more than 1,800 signatures collected from residents and supporters concerned about the project’s potential impact on the surrounding area. The effort comes after the Mansfield City Council unanimously approved a development agreement earlier this month for the proposed travel center according to WCMH. Development approved near Interstate 71 The project calls for a 74,000-square-foot Buc-ee’s facility with approximately 120 fueling stations on a 37.5-acre site near Interstate 71 and Lucas Road. Local officials have promoted the development as a major economic investment for the area. Jodie Perry celebrated the council’s approval, stating the project is expected to create local jobs and generate an estimated annual payroll of approximately $9 million. Tony Vero also praised the development, describing it as a significant investment for Richland County. “This project represents the kind of economic development that creates jobs, generates new opportunities, and helps position Richland County for continued success,” Vero wrote in a June 2 social media post. Petition organizers cite multiple concerns Opponents of the project argue the development could create challenges for nearby residents and businesses. According to the petition, concerns include: Increased traffic congestion Potential environmental impacts Possible declines in nearby property values Public safety concerns Effects on neighboring agricultural operations As of Tuesday afternoon, the petition had gathered 1,813 signatures. Buc-ee’s declined to comment when contacted regarding the opposition campaign. Farm owners voice concerns Among the most vocal critics are Nick and Rachel Stadelman, whose family farm is located adjacent to the proposed development site. Nick Stadelman said he supports economic development but believes the project could create operational difficulties for his farming business. “I get it – I’m all about more jobs and more revenue,” Stadelman said. “I understand all that, but on the same token, we’re kind of steamrolling the local community in the process.” He said concerns include moving large farm equipment through an area expected to experience significantly higher traffic volumes once the travel center opens. “They want us to integrate our farm equipment in with their traffic and go out the roundabout with their traffic,” Stadelman said. Environmental and quality-of-life concerns raised The petition also references concerns about potential environmental impacts, including fuel spills, stormwater runoff, and groundwater contamination. Nick Stadelman additionally expressed concerns about light pollution and its possible effects on agricultural operations. Rachel Stadelman said she worries about litter reaching the family’s property and being consumed by livestock. The family said they have invested years building their farming operation and are concerned about how the project could affect its future. Safety concerns highlighted by residents Opponents have also raised concerns regarding public safety and increased traffic associated with a large, 24-hour travel center. Rachel Stadelman said her primary concern involves the safety of her three daughters, whose home is located next to the proposed development site. “Being a mother of three children, all girls, ages 4, 6 and 8, my main concern is their safety; our yard is right next to the proposed site,” she said. The petition cites concerns about crime and human trafficking risks near large transportation hubs. Next steps With the development agreement approved, project planning and permitting efforts are expected to continue. Opponents say they will continue gathering support and raising concerns with local officials, while supporters maintain the development will provide jobs, tax revenue, and increased visibility for the Mansfield area. The Takeaway Major travel center approved Mansfield City Council has approved a development agreement for a 74,000-square-foot Buc-ee’s travel center near Interstate 71 and Lucas Road. Opposition campaign growing A petition opposing the project has surpassed 1,800 signatures, with residents citing concerns about traffic, environmental impacts, property values, and public safety. Economic benefits remain central argument Supporters, including local elected officials, say the project represents a significant economic investment expected to create jobs and generate millions of dollars in annual payroll for the region. The post Neighboring Farm Owners Raise Concerns About Buc-ee’s Development Near I-71 appeared first on WOWO News/Talk 92.3 FM and 1190 AM. ...read more read less